AI first-round interviewer

Every candidate gets a real interview.Every decision is made by a human.

Kestrel runs the whole first round — application, resume verification, a 30-minute two-way interview, and a ranked shortlist your hiring manager can read in five minutes.

Built for in-house recruiters, HR teams without a recruiting function, and hiring managers who need a first round that holds up to being questioned.

  • Browser voice
  • Phone call
  • WhatsApp
  • Text chat

Who it is for

Making an effective placement decision is hard

Most of what makes it hard is not the work — it is who interviewed well, who reminded you of someone, who you spoke to last. This takes the emotion out of the first round and puts the best fit for the role in front of you, with the evidence for it attached.

In-house recruiters running volume

One role, two hundred applicants, and a first round that realistically reaches thirty of them. Everyone gets the interview; you get a ranked shortlist instead of a resume pile.

HR teams with no recruiting function

You own hiring on top of payroll, benefits and everything else. This runs the first round end to end and hands you a scorecard a hiring manager can read in five minutes.

Hiring managers who interview rarely

Interviewing well is a skill that decays between openings. The competencies, the follow-ups and the anchors are the same for every candidate, so the comparison holds up.

Anyone who has to defend a decision

Agencies, regulated employers, and teams hiring into New York or Illinois. Disclosure, consent, quoted evidence and an audit log for every access come as standard.

One role, everyone who applied

The whole pipeline as one list

Every candidate, what they scored, which channel they chose, and what still needs a person. Filter it, save the view, export it, or send two to eight of them to the comparison.

kestrel · candidates
Eighteen candidates on one role. Rows marked synthetic are the seeded benchmark corpus this demonstration runs on.

How it works

Four steps, in this order

The numbering is the sequence a candidate actually moves through, from the application to the moment a person on your team makes the call.

Step 1

They apply on your careers page

Branded page or embeddable widget. The resume is parsed on upload; gaps, overlaps and inflated titles are flagged for the interviewer to probe, never used to reject.

kestrel · step 1
Step 2

They interview right away, their way

Voice in the browser, a phone call, WhatsApp, or text chat, in English. No account, no app, and no timer punishing someone who thinks before answering.

kestrel · step 2
Step 3

Every answer is scored against an anchor

25 to 40 minutes: resume walk-through with verification, STAR deep-dives with adaptive follow-ups, role scenarios, and consistency checks woven in. Each score cites the line it came from.

kestrel · step 3
Step 4

Your team decides

Stack-rank the shortlist, read the arithmetic behind any ranking, and advance or decline. Nobody is declined without a person clicking decline.

kestrel · step 4

Why it matters

Hiring is expensive, slow, and mostly unstructured

2×more predictive

Structured interviews predict job performance about twice as well as unstructured ones — validity .42 against .19.

Why every candidate gets the same competencies, the same rubric and the same anchors.

Source: Sackett et al. (2022) meta-analysis; Schmidt & Hunter (1998) found .51 against .38

60%never finish applying

Three in five workers have started a job application and abandoned it before submitting.

Why the interview starts immediately, in the browser, with no account and no app.

Source: iCIMS, 2025 State of Frontline Hiring Report

$4,129average cost per hire

The most-cited industry benchmark for what a single hire costs in direct recruiting spend alone.

Why the first round is worth doing properly rather than screening on a resume scan.

Source: SHRM Human Capital Benchmarking Report, fiscal year 2015 — dated, and almost certainly higher now

$1,500a day, per violation

New York City fines employers who use an automated hiring tool without an annual bias audit or candidate notice — and counts every single day the tool is used as a separate violation.

Why disclosure, consent and an audit log are built in rather than bolted on.

Source: NYC DCWP, Local Law 144 ($500 first violation, $500-$1,500 thereafter). Illinois AIVIA separately requires consent before AI video interviews.

What this will never do

The features we left out are the point.

Most AI interviewing tools score a candidate on how they look and sound. That is the part regulators are closing in on, and the part that is hardest to defend when someone asks why they were rejected.

  • No facial analysis

    No video scoring, no micro-expressions, no gaze tracking. Nothing about a face enters a score.

  • No scoring on how you sound

    An accent, a stammer or a flat affect cannot move a number. Where an answer is delivered unlike the same candidate's other answers, that prompts one more question and never a score.

  • No personality inference

    No five-factor profile, no culture-fit index, no proxy for traits nobody agreed to be measured on.

Pre-send classifier · example

Blocked before it was asked

“Do you have kids at home who might make the weekend shifts difficult?”

Asked instead

“This role needs two weekends a month on site. Does that work for you?”

The candidate never hears the blocked draft, and the block is written to the audit log.

Calibration

Check the scoring against your own judgement

Score a handful of transcripts yourself and see where the model and your team disagree, competency by competency. A rubric nobody has checked is just a number with a label on it.

kestrel · calibration

Compliance

Built to the strictest US standard, and for Mexico

Disclosure and consent
AI disclosure and consent before every interview; recording consent captured and logged. Written for Illinois AIVIA, NYC Local Law 144 and the Colorado AI Act posture.
What is evaluated
No facial analysis, no emotion analysis, no personality inference. Only words are scored. Delivery is compared with the same candidate's own baseline to decide where to ask for a specific, is disclosed to the candidate, and never reaches a score or a ranking.
Data and retention
Mexico LFPDPPP privacy notice, GDPR-ready deletion requests, 12-month default retention, per-tenant isolation at the query layer, and an audit log for every access.
Integrations
Greenhouse, Lever, Workable, BambooHR, Indeed and LinkedIn feeds, OCC Mundial, a REST API and Zapier-compatible webhooks.